Maharashtra’s confusing liquor policy
Contributors are not employed, compensated or governed by TD, opinions and statements are from the contributor directly
Traditionally, India has had a confusing, lack of clarity policy on how to treat liquor, both for local and tourism purposes, perhaps having links with Mahatma Gandhi days.What is adding to the often opposing trends in the sale of liquor is the federal structure of the country, temptation to make drinking habit a revenue earner for the exchequer, overtones of morality and the demands of economy and development.How else can one explain the issue of timing of shop opening and serving of liquor and of age groups permitted to enjoy a peg or two?The latest to add to the confusion is the Maharashtra government decision to allow only people above 25 to buy hard liquor, while mild beer can be had if you are 21 or more. Naturally, this has led to protests, as it will sure lead to corruption and disputes on whom and how the age should be determined?Surely, a lucrative fake certificate industry will crop up, if the decision is implemented.Over the years, states like Delhi have attempted with enlarging the scope of drinking, allowing the bars to open till late, even as the licence fees as such have been hiked to make the exchequer richer.States like Gujarat still make drinking a bit difficult, although tourists are allowed to enjoy their drink in the privacy of their rooms.Tourism is bound to suffer if the dry laws are taken to their logical end.
Comments are closed.